From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: doncatnip <gnopap@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: awesome: Add awesome-3.5
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 19:26:11 +0200
Message-ID: <20160825192611.759f04d0@gmail.com>
References: <20160825030933.06c8d523@gmail.com>
	<87inup42zl.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<87wpj5gpeg.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<87oa4hgodk.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<87h9a8ucqw.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45672)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gnopap@gmail.com>) id 1bcwXr-0005PY-HW
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:26:20 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gnopap@gmail.com>) id 1bcwXn-0006vY-9F
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:26:18 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-x244.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::244]:34065)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gnopap@gmail.com>) id 1bcwXn-0006vT-2P
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:26:15 -0400
Received: by mail-wm0-x244.google.com with SMTP id q128so7887347wma.1
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 08:26:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87h9a8ucqw.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:47:19 +0000
ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> wrote:

I'm sorry, I just don't really know what to say about this as my
experience with hardening is rather non-existant. I can sure find out
how to disable dbus and submit another patch.

> ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:
>=20
> >> Works for me (written from inside a running awesome-3.5.9). =20
> >
> > ng0@shadowwalker ~$ awesome --version
> > awesome v3.5.9 (Mighty Ravendark)
> > =E2=80=A2 Build: Sun Mar 06 14:05:54Z 2016 for x86_64 by gcc version 4.=
9.3
> > (@) =E2=80=A2 Compiled against Lua 5.2.4 (running with Lua 5.2)
> > =E2=80=A2 D-Bus support: =E2=9C=94 =20
>=20
> Great, the joy of a limited font... Nevermind this message then for
> obvious reasons but rather take it as a note that dbus and hardening
> is something we need to watch in the future ;)
>=20
> > Having no dbus support will help with eventual hardening of Guix,
> > but why do we not have it in awesome?=20
> > And why would we we need it (dbus support) at all? I don't even
> > know why I used to build it with dbus support before. Works either
> > way. =20
>=20