From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] gnu: Add steghide. Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:16:11 -0400 Message-ID: <20160823201611.GB22647@jasmine> References: <20160823061512.13024-1-ericbavier@openmailbox.org> <20160823061512.13024-2-ericbavier@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57778) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bcI7W-0006HE-KO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:16:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bcI7S-0007FQ-9k for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:16:25 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:42229) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bcI7R-0007E4-3a for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:16:22 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160823061512.13024-2-ericbavier@openmailbox.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Eric Bavier Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 01:15:10AM -0500, Eric Bavier wrote: > * gnu/packages/image.scm (steghide): New variable. > * gnu/packages/patches/steghide-fixes.patch: New patch. > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it. > + (arguments > + `(#:make-flags '("CXXFLAGS=-fpermissive"))) ;required for MHashPP.cc My understanding is that '-fpermissive' downgrades some compiler errors to warnings. Is that correct? > diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/steghide-fixes.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/steghide-fixes.patch I don't understand what this patch does (I don't know any C++). Can you add some comments explaining it? Should we try to get the upstream maintainers to apply it?