From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet-gtk: Add libunique support in gnunet-gtk. Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 21:30:25 -0400 Message-ID: <20160823013025.GA11561@jasmine> References: <87twec8k4t.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34943) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bc0YC-0007Y0-Aa for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 21:30:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bc0Y0-0001Ub-0V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 21:30:47 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:48683) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bc0Xy-0001Ey-KT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 21:30:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87twec8k4t.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:21:54PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > In the commit message, is the ending "in gnunet-gtk" unnecessary? It > almost feels like it. Yes, I think it's unnecessary, so I removed it. > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet-gtk: Add libunique support in gnunet-gtk. > > * gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gnunet-gtk)[inputs]: Add libunique. > [arguments]: Add "--with-libunique" to #:configure-flags. Thanks, pushed as d8bc4729f8!