From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add libunique. Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:47:17 -0400 Message-ID: <20160822194717.GA25668@jasmine> References: <87shulaozs.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87fuqldevt.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87bn1712e8.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20160815180347.GA28120@jasmine> <87bn0thak9.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20160816194503.GA19955@jasmine> <87d1l73eon.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20160819225158.4oecw5yfd4btgdmb@jasmine> <87y43req8r.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87r39gx50u.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42417) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbvC0-0002hI-Eo for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:47:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbvBv-0001pG-F0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:47:32 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:46264) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbvBu-0001oQ-8r for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:47:27 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r39gx50u.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 02:16:49PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > So we need libunique definitely: > > libunique is used so that if you start gnunet-gtk applications twice, > you still only get one window. This makes sense in combination with > 'gnunet-uri', which may launch a possibly already running GUI to process > a particular URI. In this case, libunique is used to detect that the GUI > is already up, and pass the URI to the running process. > > There _may_ be a more modern alternative in Gtk3 these days, but for now > we need libunique for this functionality. > > see: https://gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=4618#c11050 > > Is this patch good for merging? Okay, pushed as 85327d0d4. Thank you for your work on this!