From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] gnu: vlc: Fix regression caused by update to qt 5.7.
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:24:03 -0400
Message-ID: <20160821232403.GA4969@jasmine>
References: <20160820215957.GA6502@jasmine>
	<20160821140825.13048-1-david@craven.ch>
	<20160821140825.13048-11-david@craven.ch>
	<874m6ddgtf.fsf@netris.org>
	<CAL1_im=v58rb07WzaeuVRXyiW2fFxBFD5y=T_MFfHh=2Rp5vjw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160821231658.GB4548@jasmine>
	<CAL1_immXggUSSEgnkOpcSLFHjAZ2u-wEOGVAps_sQo3LW+X=nQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56903)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bbc6E-0004CW-EB
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:24:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bbc69-0005du-BG
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:24:17 -0400
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:52922)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bbc68-0005bS-5I
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:24:13 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAL1_immXggUSSEgnkOpcSLFHjAZ2u-wEOGVAps_sQo3LW+X=nQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: David Craven <david@craven.ch>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 01:19:05AM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> > So, I do think it's a good idea to use that string as documentation but,
> > in this case, I think that using "qtbase" is inappropriate. What do you
> > think?
> 
> So what would be a better string? "needs qtbase"?

I would just use "qt", and mention that it should instead use qtbase in
a code comment.