From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: GCC bootstrap failure on ARM Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 14:26:08 +0200 Message-ID: <20160821122608.GA1750@solar> References: <87h9dxukjm.fsf@gnu.org> <20160526165952.GA6576@solar> <87zirajjbk.fsf@gnu.org> <20160531193337.GA22008@solar> <87h9ddksi4.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87ziqy3c4j.fsf@gnu.org> <87y43qu8yw.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60914) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbRpR-0004mJ-0f for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 08:26:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbRpN-00024H-Qq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 08:26:16 -0400 Received: from mailrelay7.public.one.com ([91.198.169.215]:62157) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbRpN-00024C-DW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 08:26:13 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: David Craven Cc: Guix-devel On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 02:17:10PM +0200, David Craven wrote: > Why are we using different package versions for the arm bootstrap > binaries than for other platforms? Simply because they have been created later, and there was no reason to change the existing ones. Andreas