From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add libunique. Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 18:51:58 -0400 Message-ID: <20160819225158.4oecw5yfd4btgdmb@jasmine> References: <1455912644-25342-1-git-send-email-fhmgufs@web.de> <20160220061819.GA9556@jasmine> <87shulaozs.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87fuqldevt.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87bn1712e8.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20160815180347.GA28120@jasmine> <87bn0thak9.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20160816194503.GA19955@jasmine> <87d1l73eon.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56104) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1base4-0001YS-Hj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 18:52:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1base0-00028o-Eb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 18:52:11 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:55879) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1basdz-000286-8L for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 18:52:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d1l73eon.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 09:52:40AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > Okay, then I think we should add the package with a comment that says > > it's unmaintained. What do you think of the attached patch? > > Looks good to me. This way if some old application should require > libunique, we have it. I'll also ask about libunique at gnunet-devel > list with some other applications I need to question. As far as I > understand Christian, they want to avoid external dependencies where > possible. A ifcase for gnunet-gtk is in the HEAD of gnunet-gtk. What does your last sentence mean?