From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: qtbase: Add search path specification for
	'QMAKEPATH'.
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:17:14 +0200
Message-ID: <20160819091525.GA1341@solar>
References: <20160814061411.22314-1-iyzsong@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41015)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1bafw1-0002Ai-HU
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 05:17:54 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1bafvv-00015X-Ha
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 05:17:52 -0400
Received: from mailrelay2.public.one.com ([91.198.169.125]:51082)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1bafvv-00015T-3x
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 05:17:47 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160814061411.22314-1-iyzsong@gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: =?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?= <iyzsong@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hello 宋文武,

thanks a lot for solving this blocking problem!

On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 02:14:11PM +0800, 宋文武 wrote:
> +               ;; For each Qt module, let `qmake' uses search paths in the
> +               ;; module directory instead of all in QT_INSTALL_PREFIX.
> +               (substitute* qt_config.prf
> +                 (("\\$\\$\\[QT_INSTALL_HEADERS\\]")
> +                  "$$replace(dir, mkspecs/modules, include)")
> +                 (("\\$\\$\\[QT_INSTALL_LIBS\\]")
> +                  "$$replace(dir, mkspecs/modules, lib)")
> +                 (("\\$\\$\\[QT_HOST_LIBS\\]")
> +                  "$$replace(dir, mkspecs/modules, lib)")
> +                 (("\\$\\$\\[QT_INSTALL_PLUGINS\\]")
> +                  "$$replace(dir, mkspecs/modules, plugins)")
> +                 (("\\$\\$\\[QT_INSTALL_LIBEXECS\\]")
> +                  "$$replace(dir, mkspecs/modules, libexec)")
> +                 (("\\$\\$\\[QT_INSTALL_BINS\\]")
> +                  "$$replace(dir, mkspecs/modules, bin)")
> +                 (("\\$\\$\\[QT_INSTALL_IMPORTS\\]")
> +                  "$$replace(dir, mkspecs/modules, imports)")
> +                 (("\\$\\$\\[QT_INSTALL_QML\\]")
> +                  "$$replace(dir, mkspecs/modules, qml)"))

What do you think, would it make sense to file a bug upstream to suggest
the modifications above?

Andreas