From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: tcsh: Update to 6.19.00. Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 22:55:58 -0400 Message-ID: <20160817025558.j5avtachcjfaso5q@jasmine> References: <20160803033336.14990-1-me@tobias.gr> <20160803033336.14990-2-me@tobias.gr> <20160807021833.GE5374@jasmine> <1cc9294b-40f9-44eb-4884-0cbbd2d15df0@tobias.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47122) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZr1b-0005QY-IJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 22:56:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZr1X-0001CV-Fs for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 22:56:14 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:48965) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZr1V-0001Bi-6V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 22:56:11 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1cc9294b-40f9-44eb-4884-0cbbd2d15df0@tobias.gr> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:50:28AM +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > On 07/08/16 04:18, Leo Famulari wrote: > > Btw, what do others think about updating this on master? `guix > > refresh -l` reports 309 rebuilds. > > OK, what I thought was an obvious leaf package turns out not to be. I > didn't even think to check. I'll quickly ‘guix build’ those too. > > That said, is 309 considered a mass rebuild in Guix? Poor Hydra is more > tired than I thought. :-/ I'm not sure where the line is, so that's why I asked.