From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Core-updates is ready for your patches! Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 19:20:01 -0400 Message-ID: <20160813232001.GD24502@jasmine> References: <20160801081958.GA2211@solar> <87lh0ggnyt.fsf@gnu.org> <87invje1yx.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87invj84bc.fsf@gnu.org> <20160802174821.GA29590@jasmine> <874m7297xg.fsf@gnu.org> <20160803040446.GA23535@jasmine> <20160806144222.GA3949@jasmine> <20160810194915.GA25076@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52408) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bYiDv-0004bN-Ck for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 19:20:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bYiDr-00037e-Jj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 19:20:15 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:60599) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bYiDq-00032g-D3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 19:20:11 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Manolis Ragkousis Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 10:15:58AM +0300, Manolis Ragkousis wrote: > On 08/10/16 22:49, Leo Famulari wrote: > > Since this required me to re-sign these commits, will somebody please > > review the differences between WIP-core-updates and core-updates-next, > > to make sure I've done the right thing? > >=20 > > When I get the "okay", I will rename the branch to core-updates, and > > then it will be "open for business" :) >=20 > Seems good to me. My local changes apply cleanly to the new branch and > my patches work as expected. Thanks for your review, Manolis. I've renamed WIP-core-updates to core-updates, and deleted core-updates-next. --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXr6sdAAoJECZG+jC6yn8IB+UQAMIXnZjkkJymN1iOBWXBT4Nk dSd1i+jt5GUh0+3O9yfBt/qWC0PbYFDAPd0oym5jwEnyQfwSPw96Z1zKbQ/ct240 9IixrH41u+frw9rbJ1eT0rrlS+V5i1iwme2ISbZrjSdzX8qyX8AQOwh7kRQDJpqM reEvUH5bcXxXImNgGKyf02pbhNqjPeSzC5e+P2eAIsz+b/anSZrUi9q3bKnuZyiF B52NPTM2zpfMsKZcAPlw0P5ly11zQhI9xwlRlVCyocc78SjkDP1sP+XJw2aC4tbM HJ/V7WIL3SjAvAkxdT/uAdJNTGx+h+v/l2mnUf5i9r47Z4aZhryVaulkMpO2jXsy iuevblC6yNHjK3I3Jg43GxA0GIE5sVeafIZ8PTZmGrK+wPDkygyUNGcswB49DYPY ynM1OuX8M0iFhws9gm5xOAO3u2trgUf1veGZx59ILKChPP+8cl7KkeCXDK3UZvzi 4yB3OIu8hKIHM9PBVpFvYFZf5ki4DA32UDz13bJkOjZTCrV67ETQM7koIf5SFqkq J3nfDAQnRiDL/X1CxPlsRUA/Or9kZvyYbsDbMfRnXXHxN5kaDVpTzLKELt9aBaqq o4PhS7rtUuxPTN4THgq8lhTXeRAxFGSaZsmZ4rlq7xYDc/Ttwn6ffq8td3ZndZe2 nSlvW2btvLmP7ntS/hzx =eYCN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn--