From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Our git just broke Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 19:11:35 -0400 Message-ID: <20160813231135.GB24502@jasmine> References: <20160813130729.GA13976@jasmine> <87a8ggllzt.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50550) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bYi5m-0003Cu-5I for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 19:11:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bYi5g-0001EB-Iy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 19:11:50 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:54682) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bYi5f-0001Cw-CU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 19:11:44 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a8ggllzt.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: "guix-devel@gnu.org" On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 03:36:06PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > On the subject of stagit, this is a software written by the cloud of > people named "2f30", associated with the ideas of suckless. Should this > go into suckless.scm and not version-control? The logical place for me > is version-control, the second logic place is suckless.scm. I like version-control.