From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?4oCYY29yZS11cGRhdGVz?= =?utf-8?B?4oCZ?= merge is a
	squashed commit
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 12:44:53 -0400
Message-ID: <20160804164453.GB8137@jasmine>
References: <871t253ith.fsf@gnu.org> <20160803172417.GA10236@jasmine>
	<878twd20ui.fsf@gnu.org> <20160803183911.GC11621@jasmine>
	<87wpjxy4ta.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <20160803211032.GA6034@jasmine>
	<87a8gtyntw.fsf@netris.org> <20160804082400.GA1638@solar>
	<87ziosyalv.fsf@netris.org> <87a8gso9p4.fsf@igalia.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54428)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bVLlu-0005bm-R1
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 12:45:27 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bVLlo-0003fv-Jv
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 12:45:25 -0400
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:33047)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bVLln-0003Yt-DE
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 12:45:20 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87a8gso9p4.fsf@igalia.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Andy Wingo <wingo@igalia.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:06:15PM +0200, Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Thu 04 Aug 2016 14:36, Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> writes:
> 
> > Unfortunately, when I tried to push it to 'master', it was rejected
> > because of 56 unsigned commits on the 'core-updates' branch.
> 
> What's the rationale for requiring non-HEAD commits to be signed when
> pushing?  For me a signed HEAD implicitly signs all parent comments, in
> my mental trust model anyway :)

How would the rest of us distinguish between

1) a range of your commits with a signed HEAD
2) a range of your commits with a signed HEAD that you pushed after I
pushed a commit created with `git commit --author="Andy Wingo"