From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: libpsl: Update to 0.14.0.
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 10:09:28 +0200
Message-ID: <20160804080928.GB1549@solar>
References: <20160804013232.7619-1-me@tobias.gr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51909)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1bVDih-0003JP-WB
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 04:09:36 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1bVDie-0001bS-Pm
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 04:09:35 -0400
Received: from mailrelay7.public.one.com ([91.198.169.215]:30062)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1bVDie-0001ae-Bs
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 04:09:32 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160804013232.7619-1-me@tobias.gr>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hello, Tobias,

On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 03:32:32AM +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> * gnu/packages/web.scm (libpsl): Update to 0.14.0.
> -    (version "0.13.0")
> +    (version "0.14.0")
> -                "0afn2c4s2m65xifa5sfdll0s2gyqbh2q9k9nq4nsmx1b6c2i3i7x"))))
> +                "1yrfkwjw5b9y9qb4xqw7g0hk0wdscay701c1wkg8fp7lxny99iz8"))))

I think you can push such trivial changes without asking on the list, assuming
that the package still builds, and maybe also after testing one or two
packages depending on it. If you want to be perfect, you could also observe
how it then behaves on the next hydra evaluation and whether it breaks other
packages.


Andreas