From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: Code formatting
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 12:37:44 +0200
Message-ID: <20160731103744.GA9987@solar>
References: <20160729082357.17501-1-david@craven.ch> <87lh0kxncf.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160730085741.GC23346@solar> <871t2aagqd.fsf_-_@gnu.org>
	<20160731123412.7515094d@scratchpost.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32963)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1bTo81-00065o-Cr
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 06:37:54 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1bTo7x-0006Qk-Iv
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 06:37:52 -0400
Received: from mailrelay1.public.one.com ([91.198.169.124]:36648)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1bTo7x-0006Qb-6b
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 06:37:49 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160731123412.7515094d@scratchpost.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, David Craven <david@craven.ch>

On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:34:12PM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> Is there a standalone program that reformats Scheme code to what we want it to be? 
> It would be best if such a program just automatically normalized all the files for us. There's no reason this needs to stay a degree of freedom where every single person has to manually make sure it's the same regardless.

That would be great, especially to run it once over all our source files.
I tend to program by copy-paste, which also pastes random indentation errors
from random packages.

Andreas