From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Python-pathlib Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 11:28:02 +0200 Message-ID: <20160731092802.GB7588@solar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53816) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bTn2a-0000cb-3s for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 05:28:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bTn2V-0006Ci-SO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 05:28:10 -0400 Received: from mailrelay6.public.one.com ([91.198.169.200]:17551) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bTn2V-0006Cd-F5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 05:28:07 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hello, python-pathlib is one of the other packages that fails on core-updates. I am reading on its home page: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pathlib/ : "Requirements Python 3.2 or later is recommended, but pathlib is also usable with Python 2.7 and 2.6. Install In Python 3.4, pathlib is now part of the standard library. For Python 3.3 and earlier, easy_install pathlib or pip install pathlib should do the trick." So should we drop python-pathlib and keep only python2-pathlib? Andreas