From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add mono. Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 10:57:52 -0400 Message-ID: <20160730145752.GA24615@jasmine> References: <87zipidely.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb06deej.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3aud7dw.fsf@gnu.org> <20160722155556.GB13704@jasmine> <87fuqupzj4.fsf@gnu.org> <20160729162409.05b66c01@scratchpost.org> <20160729162132.GB10450@jasmine> <20160730012638.5e574721@scratchpost.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51025) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bTViM-0003I6-5i for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 10:58:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bTViI-0005dH-0w for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 10:58:09 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160730012638.5e574721@scratchpost.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 01:26:38AM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 12:21:32 -0400 > Leo Famulari wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 04:24:09PM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > > > I tried your patch and I get: > > > > > > FAIL: test-sgen-qsort > > > ... > > > phase `check' failed after 474.1 seconds > > > builder for `/gnu/store/1p5qsdgc2dxf41dfg16bza88qil931dj-mono-4.4.1.0.drv' failed with exit code 1 > > > guix package: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/1p5qsdgc2dxf41dfg16bza88qil931dj-mono-4.4.1.0.drv' failed > > > > Huh, it builds for me on x86_64 with 8 GB RAM on Debian. Can you give > > any details about your setup? > > > > If you build with --keep-failed, are there any logs describing the > > failure in more detail? > > I tried again with --keep-failed, now it succeeded O_o . > > 8 GB RAM GuixSD (git) on X200. I meant to build it repeatedly overnight, I but lacked the free disk space to do the build :/ Building again, once, I noticed the following errors, which did not cause the build to fail: --- 74232 Operation completed successfully 74233 MCS [net_4_x] CS8009-lib.dll 74234 MCS [net_4_x] CSFriendAssembly-lib.dll 74235 MCS [net_4_x] CS1703-lib.dll 74236 MCS [net_4_x] CS1704-lib.dll 74237 MCS [net_4_x] CS1703-lib.dll 74238 MCS [net_4_x] CS1704-lib.dll 74239 MONO_RUNTIME='/tmp/guix-build-mono-4.4.1.0.drv-0/mono-4.4.1/runtime/mono-wrapper' MONO_PATH="./../class/lib/net_4_x::$MONO_PATH" /tmp/guix-build-mono-4.4.1.0.drv-0/mono-4.4.1/runtime/mon o-wrapper --debug ./../class/lib/net_4_x/compiler-tester.exe -mode:neg -files:'v4' -compiler:./../class/lib/build/mcs.exe -issues:known-issues-net_4_x -log:net_4_x.log -compiler-option s:"-v --break-on-ice -d:NET_4_0;NET_4_5" 74240 Loading ./../class/lib/build/mcs.exe ... 74241 cs0080.cs... KNOWN ISSUE (Wrong error reported) 74242 cs0080.cs(5,13): error CS1525: Unexpected symbol `where' 74243 74244 cs0208-16.cs... WARNING: EXACTLY SAME ERROR HAS BEEN ISSUED MULTIPLE TIMES 74245 cs0457-2.cs... KNOWN ISSUE (Wrong error reported) 74246 cs0457-2.cs(20,23): error CS0023: The `-' operator cannot be applied to operand of type `A' 74247 error CS5001: Program `cs0457-2.exe' does not contain a static `Main' method suitable for an entry point 74248 74249 cs0457.cs... KNOWN ISSUE (Wrong error reported) 74250 cs0457.cs(20,19): warning CS0414: The private field `X.o' is assigned but its value is never used 74251 error CS5001: Program `cs0457.exe' does not contain a static `Main' method suitable for an entry point 74252 74253 cs0656-3.cs... WARNING: EXACTLY SAME ERROR HAS BEEN ISSUED MULTIPLE TIMES 74254 cs1690-4.cs... WARNING: EXACTLY SAME ERROR HAS BEEN ISSUED MULTIPLE TIMES 74255 cs1690-5.cs... WARNING: EXACTLY SAME ERROR HAS BEEN ISSUED MULTIPLE TIMES 74256 cs1690-6.cs... WARNING: EXACTLY SAME ERROR HAS BEEN ISSUED MULTIPLE TIMES 74257 Done 74258 74259 3074 test cases passed (99.9%) 74260 3 known issue(s) --- Anyways, if we can't reproduce the failure reliably, I don't think it should block the package.