From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] gnu: qt: Update to 5.6.1-1. Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 10:53:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20160730085357.GB23346@solar> References: <20160729082357.17501-1-david@craven.ch> <20160729101510.GA30683@solar> <20160729180053.GA1301@solar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33914) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bTQ23-0005pf-1j for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 04:54:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bTQ1y-0003Wh-UE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 04:54:06 -0400 Received: from mailrelay7.public.one.com ([91.198.169.215]:29727) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bTQ1y-0003WN-He for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 04:54:02 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160729180053.GA1301@solar> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: David Craven Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Sorry, the below message was intended to be cc-ed to the list, but I apparently forgot. Andreas On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 08:00:53PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 03:01:21PM +0200, David Craven wrote: > > The reason why I'm hesitant to split this into three, apart from my > > personal opinion that that's overkill, I'd rather not build qt three > > times... If you really want me to I'll do it, but I'm not really sure > > what -no-mips_dspr2 even does =P > > I am just quietly recompiling Qt over and over again :-) It just takes > a long waiting time. We had actually not planned to upgrade the monolithic > Qt any more; rather, it is supposed to disappear once our current packages > have migrated to the more modular one. So even if we update once again, > please continue to try solving your build problem with the modular Qt. > > I will also check whether our packages currently relying on the monolithic Qt > still compile; otherwise I would not push the upgrade so shortly (let us > hope so!) before a new Guix release. > > So I will commit the update in time, thank you for your patience.