From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] Add missing dependencies of Spamassassin Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 14:02:33 +0200 Message-ID: <20160728140233.6f9319a8@scratchpost.org> References: <20160728131932.0387fb87@scratchpost.org> <87h9ba564h.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32981) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSk1R-000412-AD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 08:02:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSk1M-0003tC-54 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 08:02:40 -0400 Received: from dd1012.kasserver.com ([85.13.128.8]:56928) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSk1L-0003t6-Un for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 08:02:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87h9ba564h.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org > Should I review v3 or v4? v4. I made a mistake in v3 - that's why it has a hole in the series - I didn't send it. > It would be easier if the patches would have references in one single thread, but I can work this way too. Huh, they should be a tree with the cover letter at the root now. >If this > makes all the packages before obsolete I'll mark them as such and review > only these versions. It does make all the "perl" packages (only perl) by me from before obsolete.