From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: core-updates, next release, and all that Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 10:24:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20160728082425.GA1646@solar> References: <20160724165922.GA4696@jasmine> <20160724174409.GA10837@solar> <87bn1lcp4d.fsf@gnu.org> <20160726213659.GA15537@solar> <20160727104436.GA2123@solar> <20160727162712.GA5456@solar> <20160727182851.GA6247@solar> <87wpk6vinx.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9bavfrw.fsf@gnu.org> <20160728082007.GA1567@solar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39729) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSgcN-0005k3-2Q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 04:24:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSgcI-000244-SA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 04:24:34 -0400 Received: from mailrelay7.public.one.com ([91.198.169.215]:42378) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSgcI-00023u-Ez for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 04:24:30 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160728082007.GA1567@solar> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 01:10:27AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > I pushed something along these lines as > 8b732bf6d93ad2cb529c3c5f886efe2625c5fb72, and also canceled the previous > evaluation builds and started a new evaluation. In fact, this seems to require the same number of rebuilds. Does changing the arguments field not imply that the derivation will be considered different also for other architectures? Andreas