From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: gmime: Remove gpg to gpg2 patch. Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 10:26:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20160727082624.GA1661@solar> References: <878twqj5w8.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20160725152110.GB20931@jasmine> <871t2ga85v.fsf@gnu.org> <20160726143528.GA7905@solar> <20160726235932.GA5990@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59109) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSKAm-0006B3-MD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 04:26:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSKAh-0003Dd-PP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 04:26:35 -0400 Received: from mailrelay7.public.one.com ([91.198.169.215]:34694) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSKAh-0003D1-Ch for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 04:26:31 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160726235932.GA5990@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 07:59:32PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > I'm confused — that gnupg@2.1 build looks like it succeeded. I read the > log of the test suite and didn't see any failures that were ignored. It built successfully a few hours after my report. Maybe someone restarted it, and it was only a transient failure. Thanks for checking! Andreas