From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: gmime: Remove gpg to gpg2 patch. Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 19:59:32 -0400 Message-ID: <20160726235932.GA5990@jasmine> References: <878twqj5w8.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20160725152110.GB20931@jasmine> <871t2ga85v.fsf@gnu.org> <20160726143528.GA7905@solar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37571) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSCGQ-0002am-SX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 19:59:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSCGK-00026M-Tn for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 19:59:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160726143528.GA7905@solar> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 04:35:28PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > Hello, > > speaking of gmime and gpg, in the latest evaluation of master on hydra: > http://hydra.gnu.org/eval/109021 > gnupg@2.1 fails its tests on i686: > http://hydra.gnu.org/build/1315032 > > Maybe someone involved in the recent gnupg changes could have a look? > > I understand that the gmime failure is solved by the patch under > discussion; if not, please also have a look :-) I'm confused — that gnupg@2.1 build looks like it succeeded. I read the log of the test suite and didn't see any failures that were ignored.