From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: core-updates, next release, and all that Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 19:44:09 +0200 Message-ID: <20160724174409.GA10837@solar> References: <87zip9pex1.fsf@gnu.org> <20160722215936.GA6082@jasmine> <87h9bgocyk.fsf@gnu.org> <20160723112242.GA5942@solar> <20160724165922.GA4696@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45863) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRNRr-00031f-9o for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:44:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRNRn-0002ec-64 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:44:18 -0400 Received: from mailrelay7.public.one.com ([91.198.169.215]:11510) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRNRm-0002eJ-Om for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:44:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160724165922.GA4696@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 12:59:22PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > So strange. Could the source code have been corrupted while unpacking? > Can anyone replicate this locally, so they can use --keep-failed? Yes, but I still cannot make anything of it. The build phase boils down to cd /tmp/guix-build-lpsolve-5.5.2.0.drv-0/lp_solve_5.5/lpsolve55 bash ccc where the latter command eventually runs gcc -s -c -I.. -I../shared -I../bfp -I../bfp/bfp_LUSOL -I../bfp/bfp_LUSOL/LUSOL -I../colamd -O3 $def $NOISNAN -DYY_NEVER_INTERACTIVE -DPARSER_LP -DINVERSE_ACTIVE=INVERSE_LUSOL -DRoleIsExternalInvEngine ../lp_MDO.c ../shared/commonlib.c ../shared/mmio.c ../shared/myblas.c ../ini.c ../fortify.c ../colamd/colamd.c ../lp_rlp.c ../lp_crash.c ../bfp/bfp_LUSOL/lp_LUSOL.c ../bfp/bfp_LUSOL/LUSOL/lusol.c ../lp_Hash.c ../lp_lib.c ../lp_wlp.c ../lp_matrix.c ../lp_mipbb.c ../lp_MPS.c ../lp_params.c ../lp_presolve.c ../lp_price.c ../lp_pricePSE.c ../lp_report.c ../lp_scale.c ../lp_simplex.c ../lp_SOS.c ../lp_utils.c ../yacc_read.c When I source the environment variables of the build, then gcc-4.9 is used, and the error message is printed. When I just install gcc-toolchain@5, it passes. But I do not think that the compiler version makes a difference. The offending lines are #ifndef FALSE #define FALSE 0 #define TRUE 1 #endif which looks perfectly good. When I remove them, then the compiler complains that FALSE is not defined. Andreas