From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add haveged. Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 20:06:47 -0400 Message-ID: <20160724000647.GA26863@jasmine> References: <20160723220946.13044-1-me@tobias.gr> <20160723224707.GC23753@jasmine> <353fccdc-2726-49cf-113d-e4c30cd2187b@tobias.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39753) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bR6wj-0006vE-2E for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2016 20:07:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bR6we-00046P-Pr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2016 20:07:03 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:36936) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bR6wd-000458-GH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2016 20:07:00 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <353fccdc-2726-49cf-113d-e4c30cd2187b@tobias.gr> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 01:43:12AM +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > That's the one. I've added: > > (license:non-copyleft "file://nist/mconf.h") > (license:non-copyleft "file://nist/packtest.h") > ... > > but many packages — not all — also like to add a "See in the > distribution." Looking at guix/licenses.scm, this seems a bit redundant > to me. No? I think it's a matter of judgement. Sometimes it makes sense, sometimes not. The important thing is to say where the license text is.