From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: new GuixSD version? Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 23:55:13 -0400 Message-ID: <20160720035513.GA21435@jasmine> References: <23946660-e3d3-68bc-8429-02ab15690fb2@ethan-stefan.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33842) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPibW-00043W-DP for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 23:55:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPibS-0000pF-Bl for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 23:55:25 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:33681) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPibR-0000nw-1e for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 23:55:22 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <23946660-e3d3-68bc-8429-02ab15690fb2@ethan-stefan.net> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: Ethan Stefan Day Cc: help-guix@gnu.org On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 05:36:50PM -0400, Ethan Stefan Day wrote: > Will be a new version of GuixSD installation image once the dust settles > from the Hydra outage and the Sourceforge URL issue? I ask because as I > understand it, it will be impossible to install from that image without > running 'guix pull' inside the installer, and I think I recall someone > on guix-devel saying to not do that. Can you clarify why you think it would be impossible to install from the 0.10.0 GuixSD image? Hopefully that's not the case...