From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: gnutls 'name-constraints' test failure Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 20:30:09 +0300 Message-ID: <20160718173009.GB26088@debian-netbook> References: <578A854F.30302@cock.li> <20160717073206.GA17182@jasmine> <87shv84crp.fsf@gnu.org> <20160717173334.GA2626@jasmine> <20160718164855.GA3227@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52867) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPCN8-0006PM-LJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:30:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPCN4-0005Sb-Ei for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:30:25 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160718164855.GA3227@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:48:55PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 01:33:34PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnutls: Fix test failure. > >=20 > > * gnu/packages/patches/gnutls-fix-stale-test.patch: New file. > > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it. > > * gnu/packages/tls.scm (gnutls)[replacement]: New field. > > (gnutls/fixed): New variable. >=20 > Mark pointed out that using a graft won't work, since the ungrafted and > unpatched gnutls will still need to be built. >=20 > Any ideas? >=20 Can we do an (if (system-prefix? "i686-linux" (or %target... %current...)) (disable test) (echo "hi mom!")) the other option I saw from the bug report https://github.com/libgd/libgd/issues/242#issuecomment-228676965 was apparently to add the flags -msse -mfpmath=3Dsse to CFLAGS to make it pass. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXjRIeAAoJEPTB05F+rO6TDNUP/14QtaRCyUfj92Awa89HzPQf 8WcUJihbpnbPsRQPk+IfYl61WtlDMRRpTY1ZZh8m4ERC+d0mh2WUiHr6AIQ1Yu9e Ud5WyjJjx2SIVyBZnbR9nnXteQqeAMoUnFO7OH9Ulx1BGC77BtU+OjOXFeEePzXT /Oskj/Vo1Xv4JzrBhqIwO9XZxKMtmLEL2UEeLN2xk7SqAP7LOL7aMGtCoOpv6EO/ iRtSsoRj/B1Jf5j4jKU3Sf4nBp0CFJMeEAT3aZmabM1DrBvcv3HXk9rKNjzn/ukj /UMwsR37hqLPl5d8vPx/KeGEu+tEotkMnUkYa73r4Ph+GjmxbVGEnsus5cavOtcd SUHusgY+D6d+MJdMYo34z99qpu8BQPrS/+e8NU+ykHvq+x7ftzl3IlHt+swLBYT/ 5Gegl5GenfZpqkO5hoKZG4uE4AgP8F9RxYs95nvJLYgjxCB6yLfhJNeB52bOgYmT opBjqaS6LR6TAp8tgQ46hAqBhYT24d0Sre2VV5pC/+40KdrclF4yRQDfrTdgOoNz 2tY5He1h7cY/oEvtoE0wPGytVX+NYBGUADgQ05Cv0kvsOs/z5JnSSgvv4bf7HtJj NVLzvG+xwV0b9AXuY+JV+wdEVHDlon6aSXuN1yU206myvgnGDbL+hwtg/1VCenYd ml0mzUvOMJAG24W3D0Cf =uZDJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7--