From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: gnutls 'name-constraints' test failure Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:15:52 -0400 Message-ID: <20160718171552.GA20926@jasmine> References: <578A854F.30302@cock.li> <20160717073206.GA17182@jasmine> <87shv84crp.fsf@gnu.org> <20160717173334.GA2626@jasmine> <20160718164855.GA3227@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48442) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPC9J-00010M-Jv for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:16:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPC9F-00017A-IT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:16:09 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160718164855.GA3227@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:48:55PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 01:33:34PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnutls: Fix test failure. > > > > * gnu/packages/patches/gnutls-fix-stale-test.patch: New file. > > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it. > > * gnu/packages/tls.scm (gnutls)[replacement]: New field. > > (gnutls/fixed): New variable. > > Mark pointed out that using a graft won't work, since the ungrafted and > unpatched gnutls will still need to be built. > > Any ideas? Unfortunately, the version of gnutls in core-updates (3.5.0) does not include the fix. It was introduced in 3.5.2.