From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add mdadm to the installation image. Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 14:44:36 +0200 Message-ID: <20160716124436.GA14379@solar> References: <20160714131306.GA11566@solar> <87oa605l0t.fsf@gnu.org> <20160714192125.GE11033@debian-netbook> <20160714214220.GA1025@solar> <8737nb2fr2.fsf@gnu.org> <20160715171031.GA6567@solar> <87h9bpc0vy.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33205) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bOOxY-0001QQ-Sa for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 08:44:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bOOxU-0000zp-Oq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 08:44:43 -0400 Received: from mailrelay1.public.one.com ([91.198.169.124]:44680) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bOOxU-0000yX-C5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 08:44:40 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h9bpc0vy.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 12:50:41PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > For good measure, here the size after adding also lm-sensors: > > /gnu/store/v6nlhanbhcabk2vvqmi4xsgividq1060-system 904.0 0.0 0.0% > Then we should avoid it IMO. My understanding is that not having > lm-sensors is at worst annoying, but not critical, right? WDYT? The comment was just a follow-up to my previous messages about lm-sensors and my complaint about its size. Indeed I do not mean to imply we should add it. Andreas