From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: [PATCH] Add Ribotaper. Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 11:26:28 +0200 Message-ID: <20160707092629.23884-1-ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36978) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bL5Zz-0001xu-Az for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 05:26:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bL5Zv-0002zC-5A for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 05:26:42 -0400 Received: from sinope02.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([141.80.25.24]:60304) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bL5Zu-0002z5-Rc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 05:26:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sinope02.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A942D12A6DE for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 11:26:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sinope02.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sinope02.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k3TiRT5YNk4d for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 11:26:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from HTCATWO.mdc-berlin.net (puck.citx.mdc-berlin.de [141.80.36.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sinope02.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 11:26:31 +0200 (CEST) List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi Guix, this patch adds a bioinformatics tool called "Ribotaper". It needs a somewhat older version of bedtools, because the output format produced by bedtools changed after version 2.18.0 (they don't seem to care about semantic versioning). This is why this patch not only adds a variable "ribotaper" but also "bedtools-for-ribotaper". Do you think I should rather name it "bedtools-2.18" and make it public so that users can install it? Or is it better to keep it private and name it "bedtools-for-ribotaper"? ~~ Ricardo Ricardo Wurmus (1): gnu: Add Ribotaper. gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+) -- 2.8.4