all messages for Guix-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jookia <166291@gmail.com>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: help-guix@gnu.org, t3sserakt <t3sserakt@posteo.de>
Subject: Re: GuixSD on arm
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 01:44:42 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160705154442.GA7204@novena-choice-citizen.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87furo1ok4.fsf@gnu.org>

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:23:07AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Howdy Jookia,

Thanks for your reply! I just want to follow up to elaborate on a few things:

> Jookia <166291@gmail.com> skribis:
> 
> > - Patches would get lost regularly.
> 
> Lack of responsiveness is terrible, but I think it’s easy to complain
> about it until one gets involved in patch reviews.
> 
> Also, some reviews are more difficult than other: adding support for
> another bootloader is not as simple as upgrading a package.

I don't want to seem like I'm criticising you or the developers over this,
especially since I do understand why things are this way. But the experience
from things being this way is a pain point for me at least, and there doesn't
seem to be any clear solutions yet. It's a bit annoying for things to move
slowly, but it's demotivating for things to come to a stop.

> > - GNUness over pragmatism.
> >
> > The main issue I had with doing an ARM port is the bootloader, and this is
> > because everyone I spoke to except Ludovic seemed to be hesitant towards using a
> > bootloader other than GRUB.
> 
> I wrote repeatedly that using U-Boot is fine, especially if GRUB doesn’t
> work on this platform.

I know that's your stance on it, but there's multiple maintainers on Guix and
multiple people to talk about the issue, especially if I need help or review on
code. It's unsettling emotionally to see different people, especially authority
figures who work with the code and decide what's useful or not, giving mixed
answers as to what direction things should be taken. Implementing something that
only one developer approves of makes me question if it really is the right
approach or worth people's time.

> > I have a distinct feeling this is due to a bias in building "the GNU system"
> > rather than building a fully free Guix-based system.
> 
> There is this bias, which makes a difference from most other distros.  I
> don’t think I/we are blind though: when GNU lacks the right piece of
> software, using another free software package is the right thing to do.

I'm glad to hear that.

> 
> > This experience has put me off of Guix, GNU and free software development.
> 
> I think you’re throwing the baby with the bathwater.

Me too, but this isn't really as much as a conscious decision as an emotional
reaction to what I've felt and perceived. I'm sure eventually it'll get better.

> Thanks for your feedback,
> Ludo’.

I'm sorry for the negativity,
Jookia.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-05 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-04 14:02 GuixSD on arm t3sserakt
2016-07-04 15:33 ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-07-04 16:13   ` t3sserakt
2016-07-04 17:14     ` ng0
2016-07-04 22:18       ` Jookia
2016-07-05  8:21         ` Alex Sassmannshausen
2016-07-05  8:23         ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-07-05 15:44           ` Jookia [this message]
2016-07-11 11:47             ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-07-05  8:53         ` t3sserakt
2016-07-05 21:49           ` Jookia
2016-07-11 11:49             ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-07-05 12:08         ` ng0
2016-07-05 20:46         ` Ricardo Wurmus
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-07-12 11:19 GuixSD on ARM Daniel Pimentel
2016-07-13  6:55 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2016-07-13 12:57   ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-07-19  1:47   ` Eric Bavier
2016-08-15 20:14     ` Christopher Allan Webber
2016-09-11 13:05       ` Andreas Enge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160705154442.GA7204@novena-choice-citizen.lan \
    --to=166291@gmail.com \
    --cc=help-guix@gnu.org \
    --cc=ludo@gnu.org \
    --cc=t3sserakt@posteo.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.