From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add python-pythondialog Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 14:05:30 -0400 Message-ID: <20160704180530.GB13592@jasmine> References: <87lh1hcp18.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56605) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bK8Fc-00007S-5p for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2016 14:05:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bK8FY-000086-VZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2016 14:05:44 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:33192) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bK8FX-00006H-Lq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2016 14:05:40 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87lh1hcp18.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 05:05:07PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-pythondialog): New variable. For those reading along, python2-pythondialog and python-pythondialog are separate implementations with different source tarballs. They are maintained by the same group. But, the package definitions are basically the same. The only differences are the name, the source and Python version. Should one of them inherit from the other, or should we maintain two independent package definitions?