From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Pytest update Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 16:15:17 -0400 Message-ID: <20160703201517.GA26140@jasmine> References: <20160703055839.GB4135@debian-netbook> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42998) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJnnj-0003mn-Mr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 16:15:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJnnd-0006c7-Hl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 16:15:34 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:41776) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJnnb-0006b0-2r for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 16:15:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160703055839.GB4135@debian-netbook> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Efraim Flashner Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 08:58:39AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > The patch-set looks good to me. For the curious, I checked python-pytest > and python2-pytest and ended up with 81 packages and 235 dependants, but > some of those are from my WIP tree in GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH What branch should it go on? Also, it would be good to push this series and the Sphinx series together. $ guix refresh -l python-sphinx python2-sphinx python-pytest python2-pytest Building the following 84 packages would ensure 229 dependent packages are rebuilt: [...] So, it's basically the same set of packages that would need to be re-built.