From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add khmer. Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 13:34:42 -0400 Message-ID: <20160626173442.GA5036@jasmine> References: <1466126601-30932-1-git-send-email-donttrustben@gmail.com> <20160625172911.GD21038@jasmine> <87wplcmfua.fsf@gnu.org> <576FC3B7.2060306@uq.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34122) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHDxX-0007EW-9P for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 13:35:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHDxU-0008NB-4J for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 13:35:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <576FC3B7.2060306@uq.edu.au> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ben Woodcroft Cc: Guix-devel@gnu.org On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 09:59:51PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote: > I'm not convinced, I'm afraid. According to the SMHasher README [0]: > > >This is the home for the MurmurHash > family of hash > functions along with the SMHasher > test suite used to > verify them. > > So that would count that as an independent upstream distribution of > murmurhash, right? My understanding is that SMHasher does not create a library, but just provides raw source code, leaving it up to 3rd party software authors to integrate it into their applications. Is that right?