From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add khmer. Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 13:29:11 -0400 Message-ID: <20160625172911.GD21038@jasmine> References: <1466126601-30932-1-git-send-email-donttrustben@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39139) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGrOc-0004tJ-3N for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2016 13:29:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGrOX-0002W5-3B for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2016 13:29:29 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:55528) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGrOV-0002UV-St for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2016 13:29:25 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1466126601-30932-1-git-send-email-donttrustben@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ben Woodcroft Cc: Guix-devel@gnu.org On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:23:18AM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote: > This isn't the best name for a piece of software I suggest, but it is > reasonably well known in the field. > > 'murmur-hash' takes the code from a repository SMHasher, but I'm not > interested in packaging that. That is OK? I looked at the Debian package [0]. It uses the bundled copy or murmur-hash. Since there doesn't really seem to be an independent upstream distribution of murmur, I think it's fine to do the same. What do others think? [0] https://packages.debian.org/sid/khmer