From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: libgcrypt update to 1.7.1 Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:28:36 -0400 Message-ID: <20160617192836.GA17273@jasmine> References: <20160615195328.GA13352@khazad-dum> <20160616154047.GC2245@jasmine> <20160616162825.GB29687@debian-netbook> <87d1nfvox7.fsf@gnu.org> <20160617174302.GA8255@jasmine> <20160617185923.GA24906@khazad-dum> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45907) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDzRn-0006k2-Jd for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:28:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDzRk-0000YL-F1 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:28:55 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:44597) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDzRj-0000Wb-12 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:28:52 -0400 Received: from localhost (c-73-188-17-148.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.188.17.148]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6C147F29EE for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:28:41 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160617185923.GA24906@khazad-dum> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 06:59:23PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > On 2016-06-17(01:43:02-0400), Leo Famulari wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:02:44PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > > Efraim Flashner skribis: > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:40:47AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 07:53:28PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > > >> > * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (libgcrypt): Update to 1.7.1 > > > >> > > > >> This looks good to me. What branch should it go on? > > > >> > > > > > > > > either core-updates or core-updates-next > > > > > > The latter please. :-) > > > > Okay, in that case, can you rebase it on core-updates, ng0? Otherwise is > > won't apply cleanly due to trying to upgrade from 1.6.5 instad of 1.7.0. > > > > This should be relatively easy when I have the gnupg branch still around, > otherwise I'll recreate it. > > With the wording familiar to me yet sometimes not good to comprehend even > when I hear and parse it correctly when talking: > I should rebase the commit on the branch > `core-updates` which currently is at version 1.6.5? I think your copy of core-updates needs to be updated. I pushed your patch "gnu: libgcrypt: Update to 1.7.0" as 81068f178 to it in April ;) All you need to do is get the latest core-updates, and then re-do this patch on that branch, so that it updates from 1.7.0 instead of 1.6.5. You don't need to do anything with gnupg.