From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-wcwidth and python2-wcwidth.
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 01:15:37 +0200
Message-ID: <20160615011537.6d8271da@scratchpost.org>
References: <20160612174006.64cd5ff6@scratchpost.org>
	<20160613205914.GA12302@jasmine>
	<20160614141332.60b1d272@scratchpost.org>
	<20160614134101.GB20115@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55742)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dannym@scratchpost.org>) id 1bCxYh-0006V8-Pi
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 19:15:48 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dannym@scratchpost.org>) id 1bCxYc-00055l-VB
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 19:15:46 -0400
Received: from dd1012.kasserver.com ([85.13.128.8]:48779)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dannym@scratchpost.org>) id 1bCxYc-00055h-OG
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 19:15:42 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160614134101.GB20115@jasmine>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Danny Milosavljevic <dannym+a@scratchpost.org>

On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:41:01 -0400
Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:

> > >@code{wcwidth} and @code{wcwidth}  

Is that twice the same thing?