From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Pirotte Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add guile-gnome Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 18:47:28 -0300 Message-ID: <20160607184728.25d36ee0@capac> References: <1464375363-31718-1-git-send-email-patrick.hetu@auf.org> <87y46ui2uk.fsf@gnu.org> <87ziqwkhkw.fsf@auf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/x/EiG45Uz7zOU5/7+i3PJX/"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59885) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bAOqg-0000Bs-NB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 17:47:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bAOqc-0007sL-Gb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 17:47:45 -0400 Received: from maximusconfessor.all2all.org ([79.99.200.102]:52536) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bAOqc-0007sE-AP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 17:47:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ziqwkhkw.fsf@auf.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Patrick Hetu Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --Sig_/x/EiG45Uz7zOU5/7+i3PJX/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, Le Tue, 07 Jun 2016 13:57:19 -0400, Patrick Hetu a =C3=A9crit : > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s @ 2016-05-28 12:06 EDT: >=20 > > Pushed as 9b381643f009025d97dfc0b82d2c00800c204380 with a few minor > > changes: > > =20 > >> +(define-public guile-g-wrap =20 > > > > This one is already available in (gnu packages guile). :-) =20 >=20 > Oops, I was looking for guile-g-wrap instead of g-wrap... >=20 > Still, the current g-wrap package needs a new patch to fix his Makefile.in > because the native-search-paths hooks won't find it for Guile 2.0. Note that I don't develop neither [yet] use guix [shame on me], but I don't understand why you should change anything wrt Makefile(s): from http://www.nongnu.org/g-wrap/download.html, Notes 3. "... G-Wrap's modules will be installed in $prefix/share/guile/site. If it differs from Guile's global site directory, then this path must be added to Guile's load paths before to use G-Wrap and compile Guile-Gnome or Guile-Clutter. ..." Note that G-wrap compiles and runs fine with both Guile-2.0 and 2.2. So if= Guix installs G-wrap using the same prefix as the one used for guile, which I re= commend, then nothing needs to be changed since guile's default %load-path already i= nclude (%global-site-dir), and unless $prefix would differ for guix guile-2.0 and guile-2.2, [hopefully there are the same?], then users can always fire guile and: ,use (g-wrap), independently from which guile version they are using. My 2c, but as I [administratively] maintain g-wrap, feedback welcome. > Also, should I rename it to guile-g-wrap at the same time? IMO, it's better to keep the original name, which in this case is G-wrap http://www.nongnu.org/g-wrap/ Cheers, David --Sig_/x/EiG45Uz7zOU5/7+i3PJX/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXV0DwAAoJEPN0/ZOjBXrXdjwH/jXtIrcEBmbkaHLZ4AmZRfnp d4S34/9eg3c81ME/K2gBbKrU0GVWg8bLkuysxuf2xTG+LOi8UNcUMf7FX4WuMILU KQMuTP/bVG+isBOZoW6J2ojPFMnWRS2bM3QjNcT0NvmjDaFUakOl1OIOjiuNBfR7 NNA7lQPN9BohNTOU6HyMgP7QEEsa/QO4XVIjUtcW0xyHTc5ekXAdXpcMxqHNCIEr nd4NChXJPxkwToCcBjTneDFHqOI/FNXVdI1rCUd5gV2dPYCB7VNLJU88lgqA9QRD P3oaYSWKarjPfczKZRDwMOwdxJ7BwSHrg8osOi38ZaQSn3krZwbnC6SoyNkwft4= =syPG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/x/EiG45Uz7zOU5/7+i3PJX/--