From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: qt: monolithic or modular? Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 11:15:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20160605091559.GA1504@solar> References: <20160405072220.1d828a86@debian-netbook> <20160518121757.GD13276@debian-netbook> <87a8jmw8fo.fsf@gnu.org> <20160519131750.GA8287@debian-netbook> <20160519155515.GA30912@debian-netbook> <87lh35gctz.fsf@gnu.org> <20160527192313.GA3663@solar> <20160603203032.GA29629@solar> <20160605072418.GA10453@debian-netbook> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43115) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9UAF-0006Fj-Sa for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2016 05:16:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9UA9-0008Az-TC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2016 05:16:10 -0400 Received: from mailrelay2.public.one.com ([91.198.169.125]:31005) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9UA9-0008Ao-CU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2016 05:16:05 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160605072418.GA10453@debian-netbook> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Efraim Flashner Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 10:24:18AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > To be fair, it was only the arm build that took 3.5 hours, i686 and > x86_64 both took about an hour. What took 3,5 hours was the "evaluation" on hydra: The time between the moment I made hydra look at wip-qt, and the moment the first compilation of a package started, and this at a time where hydra had nothing else to do. So I do not think it makes sense to continue working in the wip-qt branch on hydra and to evaluate it ever so often, even more so since so far nothing depends on it and we will for the time being keep the monolithic qt-5; you may as well work locally as for other packages. By the way, dropping the examples made for a factor of 2 in the compilation time; a nice improvement! Andreas