From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?B?VG9tw6HFoSDEjGVjaA==?= Subject: Re: feedback as solicited by Guix manual (Section 7.1.5) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 06:53:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20160601045313.hzbhirssd52sd2pn@venom> References: <574B8D1E.6080000@ethan-stefan.net> <20160531155854.GA27525@jasmine> <87oa7mxk8b.fsf@mailerver.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20160531175659.GA17589@jasmine> <87mvn6xehy.fsf@mailerver.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <8760tundc2.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vja6nj6yevhi44qg" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37390) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7y9g-0008Pf-Cj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:53:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7y9c-0003o5-92 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:53:19 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51668) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7y9c-0003mt-26 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:53:16 -0400 Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61868AAEF for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 04:53:14 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8760tundc2.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org --vja6nj6yevhi44qg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:10:21PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >Matthew Jordan skribis: > >> mentions using ifconfig, correct me if I"m wrong but isn't ifconfig >> considered deprecated? > >This ifconfig (part of GNU Inetutils) is maintained, so I think it=E2=80= =99s >fine. :-) Yes, ifconfig is considered deprecated for more than decade. I'm not networking guy but colleague of mine who is told me that ifconfig is just ugly wrapper not reflecting how the kernel is handling it. http://serverfault.com/questions/633087/where-is-the-statement-of-deprecati= on-of-ifconfig-on-linux iproute2 is way to go. S_W --vja6nj6yevhi44qg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXTmoqAAoJEEoj40+gM0Ntp0MP/3QlGQHjQojWBxYXgZ3JBn/J FdYfvSHDwOYD05jbSnri4/Qs9udCQHMcZ6yBcPdYjX1bMU/cVEGmIW/QPmTJk3Xn 0XrRRtVdvnmjFuVJdOGLPUoWCbor0vJcOGqy92+t+aRj3RFCsnJjh+noMAM/CAEg rYV2byuzlJTsmRNWctaMjkQvfLG5kIEGHkCDWShtRvatEt7Dj/ZZywOcu7I4RB91 9HI4zsugyAA6M4euvsHuM7pUly+x/qD1vKwG17RDuD0rGDPlwNdj86e3+AdrjmIo 2O4jvl92EYDfBhBxV0faWnDi60NVM2kAXbXPMxDqw0EC1o9mk6cQEo4DaOO9IcCK tldsfTTOQ5OEqFRFhop3sagvKX80fbzzlJNyefFHEtCvA5p0L++ztu2Fk2dtE5do 07L33lrR/FiJbhOKTs32qIHCdga34YY6d5FboBcILPyn0JmXv3r4s6H16gnpIVYX 7uRrI4ZY3Kkrq4BPkSjGquGRlBIkY9u+fZnWPoPgv8w/US3HzZEy14SNl+nYe1qC akelemttz6+Js5hNuM5Nj/exjte5ysZKX+x0rvVUwbchQTMyEegy9A+KrEJ9QpSj Te8aMVnUVOt9V954rkD52JBwGfkPfheDjC2Ai2NOXnTAHSlGQCLwlD9JtXUck0i+ +3G+KSi/oChW+YpOBPW5 =MLzY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vja6nj6yevhi44qg--