From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add libiax Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 21:02:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20160531190221.GA21454@solar> References: <87shx17pbq.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20160529004847.GA9375@jasmine> <87fuszwcno.fsf@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50781) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7ovz-00061S-BW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2016 15:02:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7ovw-0007Io-76 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2016 15:02:35 -0400 Received: from mailrelay2.public.one.com ([91.198.169.125]:41907) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7ovv-0007Ib-Rb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2016 15:02:32 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fuszwcno.fsf@openmailbox.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Lukas Gradl Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hello, just a quick comment on the name: On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 02:47:55PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote: > Upstream seems to refer to the software as "iax" "libiax" and "libiax2" > interchangeably. The "2" was the closest thing I could find to a version > number. notice that the tarball name is always "correct" as the package name, unless upstream consistently uses a different name. In this case: + "https://gitlab.savoirfairelinux.com/sflphone/libiax2/" + "repository/archive.tar.gz?ref=" I would suggest to use "libiax2" as the package name (variable name and package NAME field), and the version number as proposed by Leo. Andreas