From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: qt: monolithic or modular?
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 21:23:13 +0200
Message-ID: <20160527192313.GA3663@solar>
References: <20160405072220.1d828a86@debian-netbook>
	<20160518121757.GD13276@debian-netbook> <87a8jmw8fo.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160519131750.GA8287@debian-netbook>
	<20160519155515.GA30912@debian-netbook> <87lh35gctz.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55039)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1b6NM0-0007la-92
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 15:23:29 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1b6NLt-0005iI-NP
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 15:23:27 -0400
Received: from mailrelay6.public.one.com ([91.198.169.200]:20785)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1b6NLt-0005ho-Ar
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 15:23:21 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87lh35gctz.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 01:59:04PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:
> > Actually I just checked ./configure --help again, and I can pass the
> > flag '-nomake examples' and it shouldn't make the examples at all. I'm
> > not sure how much compile time it'll save, but it should save us the
> > 25MB of examples that we didn't really want.
> That sounds like a good idea.  We could probably create a separate
> ‘qt-examples’ package if someone needs them.

Is that not what our different outputs are for? Concerning the docs, I concur
with Ephraim that we should keep them in the same output, as their size is
negligible. For the examples, passing "-nomake examples" sounds like a good
option to me for now, with a comment in the package; and if someone complains
later, we can add a different output.

Thanks, Ephraim, for working on this!

Andreas