From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Chez-Scheme. Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 22:44:28 +0200 Message-ID: <20160513204428.GA3604@solar> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53842) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b1Jwq-0001L0-9G for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 16:44:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b1Jwn-0007aT-1D for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 16:44:36 -0400 Received: from mailrelay7.public.one.com ([91.198.169.215]:20638) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b1Jwm-0007aD-LB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 16:44:32 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Federico Beffa Cc: Guix-devel Hi Fede, just a tiny comment, as I do not have more time right now: On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 09:03:25PM +0200, Federico Beffa wrote: > There is no official release yet, so I took a snapshot of the git > repo. We can switch later. > +(define-public chez-scheme > + (package > + (name "chez-scheme") > + (version "20160512.41d94b07") Did we not decide on a convention that was "previous version + git commit", something like "0.0.0-41d94b07", so that the version numbers will increase with the next (or first) release and upgrades will be smooth? Andreas