From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: netpbm: Fix location of X color name database. Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 19:10:31 +0200 Message-ID: <20160513171031.GA32351@solar> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43411) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b1Gbp-0006bi-Ah for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 13:10:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b1Gbk-0006pk-20 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 13:10:41 -0400 Received: from mailrelay6.public.one.com ([91.198.169.200]:34389) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b1Gbj-0006pV-MM for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 13:10:36 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Federico Beffa Cc: Guix-devel Hello, On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 06:51:27PM +0200, Federico Beffa wrote: > This fixes some of the provided programs like, e.g. 'pamtogif'. I think the common practice is to separate the switch to the %modify-phases syntax and the real change into two commits; right now, the diff looks big, but I imagine it must be rather trivial. Thanks! Andreas