From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] version bump libgcrypt -> 1.7 Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 12:50:04 +0000 Message-ID: <20160511125004.GB15340@khazad-dum> References: <877ffx45n6.fsf@libertad.pw> <8737qkeknd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oa98ftn4.fsf@libertad.pw> <20160418203241.GA26832@jasmine> <87twiwqkk3.fsf@gnu.org> <20160421163242.GB10513@jasmine> <871t5vgk6d.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47786) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0TbI-0005ty-7G for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 08:50:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0TbD-0000O3-NZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 08:50:51 -0400 Received: from hello.itaskmanager.ovh ([94.23.19.21]:41961) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0TbD-0000KB-EA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 08:50:47 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hello.itaskmanager.ovh (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50F76272D for ; Wed, 11 May 2016 14:52:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hello.itaskmanager.ovh ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (itaskmanager.ovh [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8YMoDTjLyV8b for ; Wed, 11 May 2016 14:52:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (x5d83fee2.dyn.telefonica.de [93.131.254.226]) (Authenticated sender: ng0@libertad.pw) by hello.itaskmanager.ovh (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D30E96272D for ; Wed, 11 May 2016 14:52:38 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871t5vgk6d.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016-04-24(04:23:22+0200), Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: >=20 > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 07:03:40PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > >> Leo Famulari skribis: > >>=20 > >> > On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 11:53:51AM +0200, ng0 wrote: > >> >> Updated libgcrypt patch. > >> > > >> > Is there a consensus on upgrading from 1.6.5 and making the change on > >> > core-updates? > >>=20 > >> OK for doing it in =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99! > > > > Done in 81068f178. > > > >> In an ideal world, we=E2=80=99d do it in a separate branch to check for > >> breakage, but currently we lack the computational resources to do so. > > > > I'm going to build a new system with some changes to core packages. I > > could test this change as well. Are there any libgcrypt-dependent > > packages I should pay particular attention to? >=20 > Not particularly. This new version is API- and ABI-compatible, so I=E2= =80=99m > rather confident. >=20 > Ludo=E2=80=99. So I am not sure if this is libgcrypt-1.7 related, I am still debugging this and will ask on gnunet-dev and proxy-maint-gentoo about this later, but there's a slight chance that gnunet-gtk breaks with libgcrypt-1.7[1]. It might of course be the ebuild rewrite causing this, that's what I'm trying to find out. Just a heads up and notice on why nothing happened with the guix packages of gnunet, I'm stuck with debugging the last 1% before gnunet suite gets into portage. I hope this is not libgcrypt-1.7 related, but if it is, I'll adjust all packages accordingly until gnunet is patched to this. [1]: http://www.n0.is/static/pub/p/gnunet/debug/ and http://far37qbrwiredyo5.onion/static/pub/p/gnunet/debug/ --=20 =E2=99=A5=E2=92=B6 ng0 --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXMyp8AAoJEAKilhUMIBgjs6QQALfe/snlf+J8VbHAoPbKMwbb xTPhRAtrpSQEglAMM5FnkKEYNMgNMh2mJLpoZamiEI0pVQ+trWCFQOrdS8YxWkTD 6Uh5MjBh0Dk7w8bcht+xfQD/88TQfQGLcw9cWIDUDXWw/iVqXx0WlV4KaW5UBPoD TSqStaiIsWST8md1V0BpZbIHgB220f5O1JiZaj03J1NTE7HES4giE4bBJFGIu0sn sr9ljFR/pvA1KALQFIAdcFxRn0jbFYjignexKVywZ3vG4pBJGUvTOAOEyeloKXiu QB2UIO7gTp/uZkSB7HC94pdp7buPKGHfAFZGaYatWiZycMRFrMEcBRuQhE5da19i X/0/rwZRWsuR87CuQxCS6SJqjGE3bfN9jlYVLBWuozcE9u66kyi/twEXs6ZUxWVh whhniZvtWXGA+EMr5v9+xkaTJKw9ki0hmTEtVH+CsViEC4QJ8j7eNZmnOyhZlyzU hOmG8EiB00f8fxKrjPVSYt4JWTCi8tBthq2m+M2Rm9SyLOXEkbikYkqCcT8fECzg ow/zgx57hg+7mp4XqYf9/icenKifPiCk729hTlkt9ip61l6v3O9YWyWiiwHUQoX1 PYlOeNjoDcHH7CaRVp9MdvMn5J6c4R2eaQKBYrq5qbn1WOmk4GrfjYYdS7NSkKfj 25n+24ikr6k4rvaMrq5F =Z949 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J--