From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] gnu: Add emacs-ledger-mode.
Date: Sun, 8 May 2016 23:33:12 -0400
Message-ID: <20160509033312.GB25977@jasmine>
References: <1462646529.1130971.601020129.0AC4E2B2@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<87lh3lgff0.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47328)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1azbwl-00042R-T8
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2016 23:33:29 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1azbwh-00087n-JE
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2016 23:33:26 -0400
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:47792)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1azbwg-00084x-CT
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2016 23:33:23 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87lh3lgff0.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 10:46:59AM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
> Alex Griffin (2016-05-07 21:42 +0300) wrote:
> 
> > This is the Emacs mode for manipulating ledger files. Technically it
> > depends on ledger but it would have need to be a propagated input, so I
> > didn't include that. Maybe I should have? I don't know.
> 
> As for me, I think this emacs stuff shouldn't be extracted from 'ledger'
> package.  We don't do this for other packages: for example, 'mu' has an
> emacs interface (called 'mu4e'); 'asymptote' will have too (discussed in
> a separate threadą); and 'guix' itself has some elisp code.
> 
> So I think there is no need to make a separate 'emacs-ledger-mode'
> package, but instead 'ledger' package should be adjusted (if needed) to
> put elisp files in appropriate place.

Sounds good to me!