From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Red Eclipse. Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 12:38:37 +0200 Message-ID: <20160502103837.GA4942@solar> References: <20160423022054.16f7aeb7@openmailbox.org> <571B21C8.3050100@gmx.net> <20160423074645.545cb512@openmailbox.org> <87eg9sd5zq.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44408) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axBFs-0000XE-6L for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2016 06:39:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axBFg-0002DR-I7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2016 06:39:02 -0400 Received: from mailrelay1.public.one.com ([91.198.169.124]:60095) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axBFf-0002B7-4I for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2016 06:38:56 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87eg9sd5zq.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:22:33PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: > > + (name "redeclipse") > I would name the package "red-eclipse", but it probably doesn't matter. That would be in line with our package naming guidelines: replace everything that is not [A-Za-z0-9] by a '-'. Do you think we could still rename the package? Andreas