From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Ungrafting Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 16:20:57 -0400 Message-ID: <20160501202057.GB7127@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40979) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awxrs-0002Id-Vb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2016 16:21:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awxrh-0006rL-DG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2016 16:21:23 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:50184) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awxrf-0006o6-4u for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2016 16:21:17 -0400 Received: from localhost (c-73-233-160-251.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.233.160.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B39F568017B for ; Sun, 1 May 2016 16:21:02 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi all, When committing a bug fix with a graft, I think it would be a good idea to follow up on some other branch with a commit that makes the same change without a graft. Core-updates was suggested on IRC. This would mean that after each graft commit, master would need to be merged into core-updates, and then the "ungrafting" patch could be applied. Thoughts?