On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:13:09PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 04:33:16PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Efraim,
> > 
> > > On a whim I removed gtk2 and glib from pinentry and the size of the closure
> > > dropped from 700 MiB to 100 MiB. While I was at it I built a version with
> > > qt5, if someone wanted it to match a future kde/qt-based desktop. I couldn't
> > > get a gtk3 version building, but I didn't try too hard.
> > >
> > > Efraim Flashner (2):
> > >   gnu: Add minimal pinentry.
> > >   gnu: Add pinentry-qt.
> > >
> > >  gnu/packages/gnupg.scm | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > These both look good to me.  I think our policy requires to split the
> > first patch in two, one to reduce pinentry, the other to add
> > pinentry-gtk2, but I’m not sure.
> 
> I had the same thought, but it would mean we have a commit in our
> history where we *don't* have the GTK pinentry. I think we should avoid
> that.

I thought about that too. With the patches I have we'll have people who
have pinentry installed who suddenly find that they don't have a gtk-2
pop-up anymore. I suppose another option would be to leave pinentry its
name and call the curses-only pinentry pinentry-curses or
pinentry-minimal or pinentry-tty.

In terms of the commit order, maybe one to rename pinentry->pinentry-gtk
and a second to add pinentry?

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted