From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Update imlib2 and patch against CVE-2016-4024
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 00:01:02 -0400
Message-ID: <20160423040102.GA2094@jasmine>
References: <cover.1461208313.git.leo@famulari.name>
	<87bn51ggem.fsf@netris.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49236)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1atoko-0007ZC-FN
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 00:01:11 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1atokk-00086e-G0
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 00:01:10 -0400
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:55077)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1atokk-00086N-C6
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 00:01:06 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87bn51ggem.fsf@netris.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:20:17PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
> 
> > This applies from a patch from imlib2's source code repository.
> >
> > The change fixes an integer overflow on 32-bit machines. The upstream
> > says:
> >
> > Security implications:
> > *) for 32-bit machines: insufficient heap allocation and heap overwrite
> > in many image loaders, with escalation potential to remote code
> > execution;
> > *) for 64-bit machines: it seems, no impact.
> >
> > In the patch file, there are references to imlib2's source repo and the
> > CVE page on Mitre.
> >
> > I tested that feh and scrot still work with this change.
> 
> Looks good to me.  Please push.

Done as e993fb84