From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Update btrfs-progs once again and add static output Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 21:34:17 -0400 Message-ID: <20160415013417.GA3756@jasmine> References: <1459603774-9455-1-git-send-email-tobias.geerinckx.rice@gmail.com> <20160412000709.GB11228@jasmine> <20160412071344.GA15113@jasmine> <878u0gnof9.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36292) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqse2-0001zG-Uo for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 21:34:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqsdz-0006KB-9z for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 21:34:02 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:44470) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqsdz-0006Jf-6z for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 21:33:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878u0gnof9.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 06:30:18PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:07:09PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 03:29:31PM +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > >> > Some simple patches to add a ‘static’ output to the btrfs-progs > >> > package, containing statically linked versions of all the tools. > >> > >> I've applied your patches (with some very minor edits to the commit > >> messages), bringing HEAD to 5f3f3ac2874. > > > > I forgot to check how many packages would be rebuilt by the change to > > util-linux: 714. > > > > Should I revert the change and put it on core-updates? > > That would have been the way to go, yes. Okay, thanks to Dave and Mark for doing the necessary reversions. Hopefully I won't forget to check this again, but if I do it would be good for me to know what happens when changes are pushed the master branch on Savannah. Does hydra start building the changes immediately? If so, and I had reverted the change, would that have stopped the ongoing build?