From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add nlopt. Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 01:56:28 -0400 Message-ID: <20160409055628.GA21367@jasmine> References: <87vb3twtgi.fsf@gnu.org> <20160407154451.GD18750@jasmine> <87d1q1xhy1.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8l42yl4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47884) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aolsU-00031A-BP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 01:56:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aolsR-0000XJ-4b for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 01:56:14 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:51989) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aolsR-0000Wy-0Y for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 01:56:11 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a8l42yl4.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mathieu Lirzin Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 12:18:15PM +0200, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: > Roel Janssen writes: > > > Strangely enough, I couldn't apply it either. I don't know what > > happened.. I regenerated the patch, and now I was able to apply it to > > my source tree. Hopefully it works for you too now. > > This problem has already happened to me last year. I suspect it is/was a > bug in Git. I've attached the diffoscope report (HTML) between the first two patches in this thread. The diff header in the 'bad' patch says that the hunk applies to 7 lines. In the 'good' patch, the header instead says 6. The 'bad' patch can be applied when that parameter is changed to 6. I wonder if the bug can be reproduced?